The Chips curve (CEV)

Read your real performance independently of luck, with the two legends that reveal your true skill level.

Gandalf

Gandalf

Co-founder of Poker Sciences

The Chips curve (CEV)

In the previous module, we introduced the 4 KPIs of the Dashboard and covered the main pitfalls when interpreting CEV. This module moves on to the next step: reading the curves.

Curves let you do what a single number can't: compare several metrics and see how they evolve over time.

In this chapter, we'll take a detailed look at the curves of the Chips won tab, the first tab of the Dashboard .

This tab displays how your chips won evolve over your games. It's the first thing to look at when you open the Dashboard. It answers two simple questions:

  • how much of a winning player are you?
  • how do you win pots?
The Chips curve of the Dashboard with the KPIs on top: 208 tournaments, CEV of 112, and the green (Chips) and yellow (EV chips) curves displayed by default.
208 games played, CEV shown in the KPIs: 112.

The 4 curves of the Chips tab

As you can see on the screenshot above, the tab displays two curves by default: the green one and the yellow one. In reality, it contains four. The other two (blue and red) are available in the More legends menu, at the bottom right.

CurveColorDefaultWhat it measures
Chips WonGreenYesYour actual chips won
EV (chips)YellowYesYour cumulative EV expressed in chips (performance without variance)
Chips Won With Showdown (SD)BlueNoGains from pots that went to showdown
Chips Won Without Showdown (NSD)RedNoGains from pots won without showdown

A quick concrete check. On the screenshot above, the CEV shown in the KPIs is 112. If you take the final value of the yellow curve (~23,300 chips) and divide it by the 208 games played, you land right on that number.

The yellow curve EV (chips) is literally the "story" that led to your current CEV:

CEV=EV (chips)number of games\text{CEV} = \frac{\text{EV (chips)}}{\text{number of games}}

Two relationships to remember so you don't get lost:

  • the green and yellow curves measure the same thing (your chips won), from two different angles: what actually happened for the green one, the theoretical expected gains (removing all-in luck) for the yellow one
  • the blue and the red are the two components of the green:
Chips (SD)+Chips (NSD)=Chips\textcolor{#60a5fa}{\bullet}\,\text{Chips (SD)} + \textcolor{#ef4444}{\bullet}\,\text{Chips (NSD)} = \textcolor{#22c55e}{\bullet}\,\text{Chips}

In 95% of cases, the two default curves (green + yellow) are enough to read your performance.

The blue and red curves are more of a visual curiosity than a diagnostic tool, for reasons we'll cover later in this chapter.

Humorous illustration: a young man yawns in a medieval castle hallway, an old man looks at him sternly.
Tss... Is this the time you call waking up?

The break-even CEV

Remember the chapter The 4 Dashboard KPIs: we promised back then to give you later the tool that tells you what minimum CEV you need to be a winning player at your stake.

Here it is: the break-even CEV.

It's one of the two hidden legends of the tab (along with the confidence interval we'll cover right after), enabled from the More legends menu at the bottom right.

It appears as a purple line crossing the tab diagonally. This line corresponds to the minimum CEV you need to be a winning player on your room and your format. It takes into account the rake of the room and the structure of your format (starting stack, level duration, multiplier distribution).

It's the net break-even threshold of the stake you're playing.

The Chips curve with the break-even CEV (diagonal purple line) displayed. The yellow curve runs below it, indicating a non-profitable stake despite a positive profit thanks to luck.
The yellow curve runs below the purple line of the break-even CEV: on this sample, the player isn't profitable at this stake.

The reading is straightforward:

  • ↑ your yellow curve above the purple one: on this sample, you're above the break-even threshold
  • ↓ your yellow curve below the purple one (like on the screenshot above): on this sample, you're below the break-even threshold

For this line to display with the right value, your room and your rakeback must be properly configured. Without configuration, the tracker uses default values that may not match your actual setup. See the Setting up your room chapter in Module 1 and Setting up your rakeback in Module 2.

One last point about rakeback: the higher it is, the lower your break-even CEV. It's logical: if part of your earnings comes from rakeback (and not from chips), you need less CEV to be profitable overall.

You can even move the Rakeback (%) slider yourself at the bottom left of the tab (see the chapter Setting up your rakeback): the purple line moves in real time, and you'll see concretely how much your rakeback lowers your break-even threshold.

But careful: the break-even CEV tells you where you stand on your current sample of Spins. Can we conclude from this that you're a winning or losing player in the long run? Not yet. This is precisely where the second hidden legend becomes essential: the confidence interval.

Humorous illustration: a professor welcomes the first student to arrive in a lecture hall.
Ah, there you are! Come in, come in! You're the first one.

The 90% confidence interval

The second legend to enable is the confidence interval, found at the bottom right of the tab in the More legends menu. Once enabled, it frames the final value of your CEV with a bracket: the zone where your true CEV very likely sits, the one you would have over an infinite volume of play.

Crucial point: this bracket isn't an arbitrary ± X. The tracker doesn't just take your CEV and naively add ±20 to it. The interval is computed from two specific things:

  • your personal variance: the actual distribution of your session results, hand by hand, all-in by all-in. Two players with the same CEV but different styles will have different intervals.
  • your volume of games: the more you've played, the more precise the estimate. The interval tightens progressively as you play more Spins.

The more you play, the more the theoretical distribution of your true CEV (around your observed CEV) tightens. The diagram below illustrates it:

The more you play, the tighter your confidence interval becomes

Observed CEVCEVLarge volume: tight intervalSmall volume: wide interval

Both bells show the probability that your true CEV sits at a given value, around your observed CEV. The more volume you accumulate, the tighter the bell becomes around the true value.

observed CEV: the CEV that Poker Spin Tracker shows you based on the tournaments you've imported.

true CEV: the CEV you would have if you played an infinite number of games, representing your true skill level.

Behind the scenes: this isn't a homemade formula. The tracker applies a Z confidence interval, the classic method of inferential statistics: it measures the dispersion of your CEV from one game to another (its standard deviation), divides it by √n (your number of games), and multiplies the whole thing by 1.645 (the threshold that covers 90% of a normal distribution). Practical consequence: the width of the bracket tightens in 1/√n, which means it takes 4× more games to cut it in half.

Concretely, the 90% bracket reads as follows: there's a 90% chance that your true CEV sits within this interval. That's why the tracker can give you a reliable estimate of your level well before you've accumulated the "magical 10k Spins sample size" people often talk about on forums.

This time with the confidence interval enabled:

The same Chips curve as before, with the 90% confidence interval enabled. The yellow markers on the right frame the bracket, whose upper bound touches the purple line of the break-even CEV.
The yellow bracket 🟡 on the right of the tab (along the y-axis) frames the 90% interval around your observed CEV.

This bracket is very wide, and logically so: with only 203 games, the distribution bell (see the diagram above) is still very spread out around the observed CEV. Uncertainty is high.

On the screenshot above, your observed CEV (the one Poker Spin Tracker displays) is -1 but your true CEV has a 90% chance of sitting between -49 and 47...

But take a good look at the upper bound of the bracket (47): it exceeds the purple line of the break-even CEV (25). In other words, despite an observed CEV below the break-even threshold, it's still statistically possible that our true CEV is in the winning zone in the long run. We therefore can't conclude yet that this player is losing.

You have to keep playing to tighten the bracket and lift the uncertainty.

More generally, combined with the break-even CEV, the confidence interval gives three possible readings of your curve. Here are the three scenarios, illustrated:

1. Lower bound of the interval above the break-even CEV. You're statistically a winning player even in the pessimistic scenario. You can keep playing this stake with confidence.

Chips curve over 220 games with the confidence interval enabled: the 90% bracket sits entirely above the purple line of the break-even CEV.
220 games, CEV of 145. The whole bracket sits above the purple line: a statistically winning player at this stake.

2. Break-even CEV inside the interval. You can't conclude yet. Your true CEV may be winning or losing; keep playing and the interval will tighten.

Chips curve over 63 games with the confidence interval enabled: the 90% bracket is very wide and crosses the purple line of the break-even CEV.
63 games, CEV of 30. The purple line cuts through the bracket: nothing can be concluded on this sample.

3. Upper bound of the interval below the break-even CEV. Even in the optimistic scenario, you're not profitable on this sample.

Chips curve over 300 games with the confidence interval enabled: the 90% bracket plunges far below the purple line of the break-even CEV, indicating a clearly losing player.
300 games, CEV of -441. The whole bracket plunges well below the purple line: a very clearly losing player at this stake.
Humorous illustration: a young man sitting on stone bleachers, looking thoughtful, a hand under his chin, next to a black cat.
Hmmm... strangely reminds me of my own winnings curve.

Careful though: on a small sample, it's also possible you've hit a time slot with an unfavorable fish/reg ratio. You may not be profitable on that specific time slot, but you would be on another (evening, weekend, etc.).

But if that hypothesis doesn't seem plausible to you, what's left is to move down a stake or work on your game.

The break-even CEV and the confidence interval are therefore two extremely powerful tools of the Chips tab.

They're especially useful for beginner or intermediate players who still doubt their profitability at their stake. An experienced player, who already knows they're winning, doesn't need to consult them daily.

But as long as doubt remains, enable them in the More legends menu and make a habit of reading them together.

Green curve vs yellow curve: luck or bad luck

Let's go back now to the two default curves to dig into a point that's often misread: the gap between the green and the yellow. Both measure your chip gains, but with a fundamental difference:

  • the green one counts what actually happened (the chips that changed hands),
  • the yellow one counts what should have happened if the cards had fallen exactly as probabilities predicted on all-ins.

The gap between the two is pure variance on confrontations. If your green curve is above the yellow one, you've pocketed more chips than your play deserved: you've been lucky on all-ins. If the green is below the yellow, you've won less than expected: you've been unlucky.

Example of a Chips curve where the green is above the yellow: lucky player on all-ins.
Example of a Chips curve where the green is below the yellow: unlucky player on all-ins.
Left: green above yellow (lucky). Right: green below yellow (unlucky).

Concrete example:

You go all-in with AA against KK. Your hand gives you ~82% equity on the pot: the yellow curve rises sharply, because that's the expected value of the spot. But if the flop comes a K and neither the turn nor the river improves your hand, you lose all your chips: the green curve plunges.

Your performance (yellow) stays the same, only the result (green) has changed.

In the long run, the two curves end up converging: luck balances out hand after hand. That's why the yellow curve (the CEV) is the true judge of your level, and why the green one is just a variance noise around it. We'll come back to the precise mechanisms of variance in the module Understanding variance.

Showdown vs Non-showdown: no actionable signal

Let's move quickly through the blue and red curves.

They often look very different from one player to the next, and from one period to the next. Many people think there's a strategic signal to draw from them ("my red curve is flat, I need to bluff more" or "my blue curve is going down, I need to stop calling at showdown").

In reality, there almost never is.

There are 101 mechanical reasons why your blue and red curves can look totally different, on actions that nonetheless often have identical EV. Taking a bluff spot more often than not taking it makes the red rise; calling at the river more often than folding makes the blue rise.

Both can have exactly the same underlying CEV, so the showdown/non-showdown distinction has no diagnostic value on its own.

To convince yourself, here are three players all winning (positive CEV), with red curves that nonetheless look radically different:

Chips curve for a player with CEV +65 over 1,022 games: the red curve (non-showdown) rises steadily up to about 13,000 chips.
Chips curve for a player with CEV +84 over 168 games: the red curve (non-showdown) stays almost flat, close to zero.
Chips curve for a player with CEV +66 over 4,701 games: the red curve (non-showdown) drops sharply, the blue one (showdown) rises to compensate.
Three winning players, three different red curves.

None of these three players has a particular play issue. Their red curve simply took the shape it took based on the situations they encountered. Don't spend time trying to read something into it: the information that matters (your actual performance and the variance around it) is already fully captured by the green and the yellow. The blue and red curves are a visual curiosity, not a leak-finder tool.

Be wary if you come across a tutorial or video that diagnoses your leaks solely from the showdown / non-showdown curves. These curves can diverge for purely mechanical reasons, independent of your level. The real leak-finder tools are elsewhere (module Finding (and fixing) your leaks).

The buy-in table (hidden feature)

In case you missed it, a summary table by buy-in sits just below the charts. Just scroll down the page to see it appear.

Screenshot of the summary table by buy-in, below the Chips chart. Columns: Buy-in, Tournaments, CEV, EV Profit, EV €/h.
The summary table by buy-in, just below the Chips charts.

This table gives you, for each buy-in you've played: the number of games, the average CEV, the associated profit and the hourly earnings. Very handy to take stock of your volume, your CEV and your earnings by stake.

The Profit column adapts to the profit mode selected in the Dashboard KPIs: whether you display Profit, EV Multi Profit, EV Profit or Effective EV Profit, the table values follow automatically.

The filters (overview)

Finally, at the top right of the tab, you have access to a whole battery of filters: period, buy-in, position, multiplier, room, format, fish/reg, and many more.

The filters panel of the Chips tab: Date, Buy-ins, Position, Stack, Phases, Game Type, Room tabs, with a date range selection.

They let you slice your curve to isolate a specific subset of games and answer more targeted questions:

What's my CEV on the BTN over the last 3 months?

How am I doing in €5?

The filters apply to the whole tab as well as to the associated buy-in table. We dedicate a full chapter to them later in this module: Filters: zooming in on what matters.

For now, just remember that they exist and that you're not required to look only at your overall curve.

Key takeaways

The Chips tab is the first tab to read every time you open your Dashboard. Read properly, it tells you in a few seconds where you stand: whether you're making progress, whether you're profitable at your stake, and whether your sample is large enough to conclude.

4 curves, but the green (real gains) and the yellow (CEV) are enough. Blue and red = curiosities.

Green / yellow gap = pure luck on all-ins. In the long run, the two converge.

• The break-even CEV (purple 🟣) is the break-even threshold of your stake. The yellow one must sit above it.

• The 90% confidence interval (yellow 🟡) depends on your variance and your volume. The more you play, the tighter it gets.

Engraved view of the Poker Sciences Academy, perched on one of the hills of the Citadel, its golden dome bathed in light above the rooftops of the city.
Poker Sciences Academy (hover to learn more)
Home
The Chips curve (CEV)